Islamic State FALLS APART – Mullah FLEES to RUSSIA!

Black flag featuring Arabic script against a blue sky

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has reportedly prepared an escape plan to flee Tehran for Moscow with fewer than 24 close allies if nationwide protests spiral beyond his security forces’ control.

Story Snapshot

Khamenei developed contingency “Plan B” to escape to Russia with inner circle amid mounting protests
Intelligence sources report mapped escape routes and secured $95 billion in regime assets
Plan mirrors Assad’s December 2024 flight to Moscow after Syrian regime collapse
Security forces face defection risks as relatives of officials live abroad

The Supreme Leader’s Moscow Contingency

Intelligence reports obtained by The Times reveal that Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader has crafted detailed escape logistics should his grip on power deteriorate. The plan positions Moscow as Khamenei’s refuge, accompanied by son Mojtaba Khamenei and approximately 20 trusted aides. This preparation follows Bashar al-Assad’s successful December 2024 evacuation to Russia when Syrian opposition forces overwhelmed Damascus, providing a recent blueprint for authoritarian leaders facing imminent collapse.

Former Israeli intelligence officer Beni Sabti confirms Russia represents Khamenei’s only viable sanctuary, citing Putin’s willingness to harbor allies and cultural affinity between the leaders. The Supreme Leader’s psychological strain intensified following the 12-day 2025 Israel conflict, during which he sheltered in underground bunkers while Iranian proxies suffered devastating losses across the region.

Economic Warfare and Asset Protection

Khamenei controls an estimated $95 billion empire through entities like Setad, accumulated since assuming power in 1989. Intelligence sources indicate regime officials have begun securing these vast financial resources as part of the escape preparations. The Supreme Leader’s economic stranglehold extends beyond personal wealth, encompassing state resources that fund proxy networks including Hezbollah and Hamas throughout the Middle East.

Current protests stem from economic hardship imposed by international sanctions and domestic mismanagement. Citizens in major cities including the religious center of Qom demand accountability from leadership they view as increasingly disconnected from their suffering. The regime’s response involves live ammunition and tear gas against demonstrators, tactics that risk further alienating an already frustrated population.

Security Forces Face Loyalty Crisis

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Basij militia, and regular army units report directly to Khamenei but show signs of wavering commitment. A critical vulnerability emerges from officials’ family members residing abroad in the United States, Canada, Gulf states, and Dubai. These overseas connections create leverage points that could influence security personnel’s willingness to suppress their fellow citizens during intensified crackdowns.

National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani exemplifies this dilemma, maintaining family ties outside Iran while serving the regime’s interests. Intelligence assessments suggest that widespread defections among security forces would trigger Khamenei’s escape protocol, recognizing that his survival depends entirely on their continued loyalty and effectiveness in maintaining order through force.

Regional Implications and Power Vacuum

Khamenei’s potential flight would create an unprecedented power vacuum affecting Iran’s extensive regional proxy network and alliance with Russia and China. The regime’s collapse could destabilize the broader “Axis of Resistance” stretching from Tehran through Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut to Gaza. Mojtaba Khamenei’s inclusion in escape plans suggests succession concerns, though his legitimacy would face immediate challenges from competing factions within Iran’s complex power structure.

The timing coincides with broader regional upheaval following Assad’s downfall and ongoing conflicts involving Iranian proxies. Moscow’s willingness to shelter fleeing authoritarian leaders demonstrates Putin’s commitment to maintaining anti-Western alliances, even as his own resources stretch thin across multiple conflicts. This calculated support system provides dictatorial regimes with confidence that loyal allies will provide sanctuary when domestic situations become untenable.