Vance’s Mom BLASTS Abdul El-Sayed After He Attacks Family

JD Vance’s own mother just called a Senate candidate an “idiot” and joked she’d like to punch him for mocking her grandchildren’s skin color.

Quick Take

  • Beverly Vance Aikins, the vice president’s mother, publicly fired back at Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed over comments about her son’s family.
  • El-Sayed had joked on a podcast about Usha Vance’s ethnicity and described the Vance children as “brown kids” Vance supposedly sees as “less American.”
  • Aikins said the remarks were not political criticism but a “crude” attack on her grandchildren and daughter-in-law.
  • Vice President Vance already told El-Sayed to “keep my wife’s name the hell out of your mouth,” escalating the feud days earlier.

A Grandmother Enters A Bitter Senate Race

Beverly Vance Aikins does not usually make political headlines. But after Abdul El-Sayed joked about her son’s marriage and grandchildren, she spoke up. She told Fox News host Tomi Lahren that El-Sayed’s comments made her angry because “he doesn’t know JD” and doesn’t know “what type of person he is.” She does.

Aikins did not hold back her opinion of the Michigan Democrat running for Senate. She called him “an idiot” and defended her grandchildren directly, saying “those are my babies.” She also said she’d “probably punch” him if she ever crossed his path, though she framed the line as a joke, not a threat.

Her comments came after weeks of tension between her son and El-Sayed. She suggested the whole fight stems from envy, telling Lahren that Vance has “a beautiful wife, four beautiful children” and that critics simply can’t stand it. In her view, the attacks carry “no merit from any of us”.

What El-Sayed Actually Said On The Podcast

The fight traces back to an April appearance on “The Allen Analysis Show,” where El-Sayed took aim at Vance’s family while discussing his politics. He said Vance “has brown kids who he thinks are less American than everyone else,” a line multiple outlets flagged as racially charged.

El-Sayed also made a pointed joke about Usha Vance’s Indian heritage, asking whether Vance would take her “back in time to meet Papaw,” a reference to Vance’s late grandmother featured in his memoir “Hillbilly Elegy”. Fox News and the New York Post both described the remarks as racist criticism of the Second Family.

El-Sayed later defended himself, telling CNN he was trying to expose a “political philosophy that says some people are somehow more American than others.” He argued the comments targeted Vance’s ideas, not his family, and pointed to his own “brown kids” as proof he wasn’t attacking based on race.

Vance Escalates With A Public Warning

Vice President Vance did not wait long to respond. Campaigning in Michigan for Senate hopeful Mike Rogers, he told El-Sayed directly to “keep my wife’s name the hell out of your mouth because she’s way out of your league”. He went further, calling El-Sayed “very, very evil” over what he described as sympathy for anti-American extremists.

El-Sayed pushed back on that framing too, accusing Vance and President Trump of “hypocrisy” for defending their wives while, in his view, promoting exclusionary politics elsewhere. He insisted his comments were meant to highlight contradictions in Vance’s worldview, not to demean Usha Vance personally.

Why The Family Angle Changes The Fight

Political attacks on a rival’s policy record are fair game. Mocking a man’s wife over her ethnicity and calling his children “less American” is something else entirely. That distinction is exactly why Aikins stepped in. Grandmothers don’t usually do press interviews about Senate races, but insulting her grandkids apparently crossed a line she couldn’t ignore.

El-Sayed insists he was making a point about Vance’s political philosophy, not attacking a family. Reasonable people can debate that claim. But when the remarks single out children’s skin color and a wife’s heritage, “political philosophy” starts sounding like a convenient label slapped on afterward. Aikins wasn’t buying it, and plenty of voters likely won’t either.

The episode also fits a familiar pattern in modern campaigns, where personal remarks get quickly relabeled as either sharp political commentary or unfair family attacks, depending on which side is talking. The Michigan Senate race, already one of the most closely watched in the country, now carries this family feud into its final stretch heading toward November.

Sources:

nypost.com, cnn.com, foxnews.com, wsj.com, forbes.com, facebook.com, bbc.com